Recent losses on private loans have demonstrated that the lack of diligence on the borrower and collateral verification are responsible for many defaults. A study by PKF O'Connor Davies points out that weakness in debtor analysis and the absence of independent asset verification are driving losses in direct lending. To mitigate these risks, they recommend applying layered protections, including due diligence of the debtor, collateral verification, enforceable contractual clauses, compliance covenants , as well as continuous monitoring.
Today, several platforms are used, which function as tools that provide the information needed to make better decisions when structuring a loan.
Due due diligence goes beyond financial analysis: it involves knowing the debtor, understanding the business, its scope, and the governance of the company under analysis, verifying ultimate beneficiaries, reputation, internal controls, market context, and current regulations; validating and protecting collateralthrough public records, inspections, and appropriate contractual clauses; and maintaining continuous monitoring of the collateral. Real-time information is key, because changes in the company or the market can deteriorate the value of the guarantees and thus increase the VaR (Value at Risk) of the financing.
A well-executed due diligence is structured in stages, each with specific objectives ranging from initial contact with the borrower to post-disbursement monitoring. The main phases and associated controls are summarized below:
Over the past decade, private debt has experienced sustained growth and significant structural transformation, consolidating its position as a core asset class within alternative markets. What was previously characterized as a space for flexible solutions, less supervision, and bilateral relationships now operates under much more demanding standards in terms of information, governance, and regulatory control.
This change has been driven by the strengthening of regulatory frameworks, the growing participation of institutional investors, and the need to mitigate risks evidenced in recent financial stress cycles. The result is an ecosystem where informality has been replaced by robust documentation, external audits, formal valuation policies, and reporting periodic and structured reporting to investors. The convergence towards standards increasingly similar to those of banks is now a reality, reflecting the maturity and professionalization of the industry.
For further insight, review: PKF O'Connor Davies (layered protections and examples of faults), Debexpert (checklists and validation methods), Preqin Global Report (market information), and the SBS and Basel III regulations regulations on risk management, compliance, and new requirements.
Raimundo Fuenzalida
Portfolio Manager, Private Debt, Fynsa AGF